Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do or Die EP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. per A9 being due to band article being deleted per related AFD JForget 03:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Do or Die EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album fails WP:NALBUMS. Never charted anywhere, hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources. Article has been tagged as an orphan for months and has little in the way of reliable sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: See the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facel Vega (band) Niteshift36 (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 03:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Alan - talk 04:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I would like to point out that there is a difference between "did not chart" and "non-notable." Per WP:NALBUMS, an album can be considered notable if it appeared on a chart, but that does not automatically imply that an album is not notable because it did not appear on a chart. Regardless, for the present discussion this album has not been covered outside of unreliable fanzines and self-promotional social networking sites. That is a reason for deletion due to non-notability. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps that is why "didn't chart" isn't the only reason given. Just a thought. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.